| TABLE 6.1 Comparison of Name Resolution Schemes |
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| NetBIOS broadcasts | No administration involved. | Limited to local area. Not very network-friendly. |
| HOSTS files | Quick and efficient resolution. No dependence on the network. | Changing individual HOSTS files on many computers can be a tedious process. |
| LMHOSTS files | Centralized administration possible. Can be used to cache names and addresses of important servers in memory. | Propagating centralized LMHOSTS files can be tedious. Has potential security problems. |
| DNS | Distributed database of host names and addresses. Follows the Internet standards. | Problematic with dynamic configuration of IP addresses because each name and IP address must be entered manually on the DNS server. Additions and changes can create problems. |
| WINS | Distributed database of computer names and addresses. Automatic name registration. Unlike DNS, names and addresses dont have do be entered manually. | Works only with Windows computers. New solutions like Services for Unix from AT&T and Project Cascade from Sun are bringing this to Unix environments. |
| Dynamic DNS | Automatic registration of host names by interacting with DHCP servers. | Fairly new. Improved in Windows 2000 Server. NT 4.0 support through third-party software. |